Расширенный поиск
рефераты Главная
рефераты Астрономия и космонавтика
рефераты Биология и естествознание
рефераты Бухгалтерский учет и аудит
рефераты Военное дело и гражданская оборона
рефераты Государство и право
рефераты Журналистика издательское дело и СМИ
рефераты Краеведение и этнография
рефераты Производство и технологии
рефераты Религия и мифология
рефераты Сельское лесное хозяйство и землепользование
рефераты Социальная работа
рефераты Социология и обществознание
рефераты Спорт и туризм
рефераты Строительство и архитектура
рефераты Таможенная система
рефераты Транспорт
рефераты Делопроизводство
рефераты Деньги и кредит
рефераты Инвестиции
рефераты Иностранные языки
рефераты Информатика
рефераты Искусство и культура
рефераты Исторические личности
рефераты История
рефераты Литература
рефераты Литература зарубежная
рефераты Литература русская
рефераты Авиация и космонавтика
рефераты Автомобильное хозяйство
рефераты Автотранспорт
рефераты Английский
рефераты Антикризисный менеджмент
рефераты Адвокатура
рефераты Банковское дело и кредитование
рефераты Банковское право
рефераты Безопасность жизнедеятельности
рефераты Биографии
рефераты Маркетинг реклама и торговля
рефераты Математика
рефераты Медицина
рефераты Международные отношения и мировая экономика
рефераты Менеджмент и трудовые отношения
рефераты Музыка
рефераты Кибернетика
рефераты Коммуникации и связь
рефераты Косметология
рефераты Криминалистика
рефераты Криминология
рефераты Криптология
рефераты Кулинария
рефераты Культурология
рефераты Налоги
рефераты Начертательная геометрия
рефераты Оккультизм и уфология
рефераты Педагогика
рефераты Политология
рефераты Право
рефераты Предпринимательство
рефераты Программирование и комп-ры
рефераты Психология
рефераты Радиоэлектроника

Thomas More Utopia

Thomas More Utopia


Faculty of Foreign Languages

Thomas More


Open University

5 course


. Introduction

. “Utopia”

. The Second Book

. Conclusion

. Bibliography


The "dark" Middle Ages were followed by a time known in art and literature

as the Renaissance. The word "renaissance" means "rebirth" in French and

was used to denote a phase in the cultural development of Europe between

the 14th and 17th centuries.

Thomas More, the first English humanist of the Renaissance, was born in

London in 1478. Thomas More wrote in English and in Latin. The humanists

of al1 European countries communicated in the Latin language, and their

best works were written in Latin.

His style is simple, colloquial end has an unaffected ease. The work by

which he is best remembered today is "Utopia" which was written in Latin in

the year 1516. It has now been translated into all European languages.

"Utopia" (which in Greek means "nowhere") is the name of a non-existent

island. This work is divided into two books.

In the first, the author gives a profound and truthful picture of the

people's sufferings and points out the socia1 evils existing, in England at

the time. In the second book more presents his ideal of what the future

society should be like.

“The word "utopia" has become a byword and is used in Modern English to

denote an unattainable ideal, usually in social and political matters. But

the writer H.G. Wells, who wrote an introduction to the latest edition,

said that the use of the word "utopia" was far from More's essentia1

quality, whose mind abounded in sound, practical ideas. The book is in

reality a very unimaginative work.” (Harry Levin, “The Myth of the Golden

Age in the Renaissance.” 1969.)

Thomas More's "Utopia" was the first literary work in which the ideas of

Communism appeared. It was highly esteemed by all the humanists of Europe

in More's time and again grew very popular with the socialists of the 19th

century. After More, a tendency began in literature to write fantastic

novels on social reforms, and many such works appeared in various



The historical Thomas More, the author of Utopia, was an extraordinarily

complicated man who tied up all the threads of his life in his heroic

death. The real man is to me much more interesting than the plastic

creation adored by his most fervent admirers. The Utopia is the sort of

complicated book that we should expect from so complicated a man.

It is heavy with irony. Irony is the recognition of the distance between

what we say and what we mean. But then irony was the experience of life in

the Sixteenth Century - reason enough for Shakespeare to make it perhaps

his most important trope while the century was drawing to a close.

Everywhere in church, government, society, and even scholarship profession

and practice stood separated by an abyss.

In Utopia three characters converse and reports of other conversations

enter the story. Thomas More appears as himself. Raphael Hythlodaeus or

Raphael Nonsenso, as Paul Turner calls him in his splendid translation is

the fictional traveler to exotic worlds. More's young friend of Antwerp

Peter Gillis adds an occasional word.

Yet the Thomas More of Utopia is a character in a fiction. He cannot be

completely identified with Thomas More the writer who wrote all the lines.

Raphael Hythlodaeus's name means something like "Angel" or "messenger of

Nonsense." He has traveled to the commonwealth of Utopia with Amerigo

Vespucci, seemingly the first voyager to realize that the world discovered

by Columbus was indeed a new world and not an appendage of India or China.

Raphael has not only been to Utopia; he has journeyed to other strange

places, and found almost all of them better than Europe. He is bursting

with the enthusiasm of his superior experiences.

But how seriously are we to take him? The question has been much debated.

The Thomas More in the story objects cautiously and politely to Raphael's


Anyway, the main point about renaissance dialogues and declamations such as

Utopia is that their meaning depends on how we hear them. How we hear them

depends on what we bring to them.

“More was one of the most thorough and consistent thinkers in the Sixteenth

Century. He argued everything like the splendid lawyer he was. I believe

that when we read Utopia dialectically, through his other works, we may

penetrate to some degree the ironic screen that he has thrown over the

work. Even so, complete certainty about his meaning sometimes eludes us.”

(Harry Levin, The Myth of the Golden Age in the Renaissance, New York,

Oxford University Press, 1969.)

The Second Book

The second "book" or chapter in More's work – the description of the island

commonwealth somewhere in the New World. I shall leave aside the

fascinating first book, which is a real dialogue--indeed an argument

between the traveler Raphael Nonsenso and the skeptical Thomas More. I

shall rather discuss the second book, Nonsenso's description of this

orderly commonwealth based on reason as defined by the law of nature. Since

the Utopians live according to the law of nature, they are not Christian.

Indeed they practice a form of religious toleration – as they must is they

are to be both reasonable and willing to accept Christianity when it is

announced to them.

What is the Utopian commonwealth? What does the little book mean?

“As opposed to the official feast, one might say that carnival celebrated

temporary liberation from the prevailing truth and from the established

order; it marked the suspension of all hierarchical rank, privileges,

norms, and prohibitions. Carnival was the true feast of time, the feast of

becoming, change, and renewal. It was hostile to all that was immortalized

and completed.” (Mikhail Bakhtin, Rabelais and His World, Indiana

University Press, 1984.)

Utopia provides a second life of the people above and beyond the official

life of the "real" states of the Sixteenth Century. Its author took the

radical liberty to dispense with the entire social order based on private

property, as Plato had done for the philosopher elite in his Republic.

“But at the same time, More took the liberty to suppose a commonwealth

built on the pessimism about human nature propounded by St. Augustine,

More's most cherished author. Augustine believed that secular government

was ordained by God to restrain fallen humankind from hurtling creation

into chaos. Without secular authority to enforce peace, sinful human beings

would topple into perpetual violence; so the state exists to keep order.”

(Mikhail Bakhtin)

A major source of violence among fallen human beings is cupidity, a form of

lust. Sinful human beings have an insatiable desire for things. For

Augustine there was no end to it.

So if we look at Utopia with More's Augustinian eye, we see a witty play on

how life might develop in a state that tried to balance these two impulses--

human depravity and a communist system aimed at checking the destructive

individualism of corrupt human nature. It is carnival, a festival, not a

plan for reform. When the carnival is over, and we come to the end of the

book, reality reasserts itself with a crash. More did not see in Utopia a

plan of revolutionary reform to be enacted in Christian Europe. Remember

the subtitle

The six-hour working day in Utopia also represents an eternal check against

the tendency of an acquisitive society to turn human beings into beasts of

burden to be worked as if they had no claim over themselves. Set over

against the misery of peasants depicted in the vision of Piers the Plowman

or against the child labor of early industrial America or the sweatshops of

modern Asia, the Utopian limitation on labor is a way of saying that life

is an end in itself and not merely an instrument to be used for someone


It is perhaps also a rebuke to those of us for whom work and life come to

be identical so that to pile up wealth or reputation makes us neglect

spouses, children, friends, community, and that secret part of ourselves

nourished by the willingness to take time to measure our souls by something

other than what we produce.

The sanitation of the Utopian cities is exemplary. The Utopians value

cleanliness and they believe that the sick should be cared for by the

state. The Utopians care for children. Education is open to all. They like

music, and in an age that stank in Europe, the Utopians like nice smells.

To average English people of the Sixteenth Century – living in squalor and


But to middle-class people like ourselves, our messy and fragmented society

looks good in comparison to Utopia. Here More's Augustinian conception of

sinful humankind becomes burdensome to the soul, for in the Utopian

commonwealth, individualism and privacy are threats to the state. I suspect

that we see as clearly as anywhere in Utopia just why communism did not

work. The weight of human depravity was simply too much to be balanced by

eliminating private property. Yet it is worth saying that More did not

ignore that depravity. Utopia is full of it.

“No locks bar Utopian doors--which open at a touch.” (Thomas More, Utopia,

tr. Paul Turner, London, Penguin, 1965, p. 73) The only reason the Utopians

can imagine for privacy is to protect property; there being no private

property, anybody can walk into your house at any time to see what you're

doing. Conformity is king. All the cities and all the houses in the cities

look pretty much alike. Of the towns Raphael says, "When you've seen one of

them, you've seen them all." (Thomas More, Utopia, tr. Paul Turner, London,

Penguin, 1965, p.71)

The Utopians change houses by lot every ten years just so they won't get

too attached to any endearing little idiosyncrasies in a dwelling. The

Utopian towns are as nearly square as the landscape will allow; that means

they are built on a grid. I can imagine nothing more similar to Utopian

cities in our own day than the sprawling developments outside our great

cities where every house looks like every other house and where even the

people and the dogs in one household bear a startling resemblance to all

the other people and all the other dogs in the neighbourhood.

I think in fact that Utopian women have a somewhat better time of it. A

small number of Utopians are allowed to spend their lives in study, freed

from the obligation to manual labour that is imposed on everyone else.

Women are among this privileged group. Divorce is permitted if husbands and

wives prove completely incompatible and if the case is investigated by the

authorities. But a husband is forbidden to divorce his wife merely because

she has become ugly. In Utopia no old rich men throw out the old wife and

take a new young trophy wife in exchange. The same harsh penalties for

adultery apply to both sexes. Husbands chastise their wives for offences.

But erring husbands are punished by their superiors in the hierarchy of


Utopia is a male-dominated society. Women have no political authority; that

authority is all placed in the hands of fathers. It is hard to escape the

suspicion that sexuality is stringently limited as part of a general belief

that passion of any kind is dangerous to the superior rationality that only

men can possess.


Let me close by making a point that I implied above. Utopia is thus not a

program for our society. It is not a blueprint but a touchstone against

which we try various ideas about both our times and the book to see what

then comes of it all. It helps us see what we are without telling us in

detail what we are destined to be. Utopia becomes part of a chain, crossing

and uncrossing with past and present in the unending debate about human

nature and the best possible society possible to the kind of beings we are.

Utopia becomes in every age a rather sober carnival to make us smile and

grimace and lift ourselves out of the prosaic and the real, to give

ourselves a second life where we can imagine the liberty to make everything

all over again, to create society anew as the wise Utopus himself did long

before in Utopia. His wisdom is not ours. But it summons us to have our own

wisdom and to use it as best we can to judge what is wrong in our society

in the hope that our judgment will make us do some things right, even if we

cannot make all things new this side of paradise.


. Mikhail Bakhtin, Rabelais and His World, tr. Helene Iswolsky,

Bloomington, Indiana University Press, 1984.

. Harry Levin, The Myth of the Golden Age in the Renaissance, New York,

Oxford University Press, 1969.

. More, Thomas. Utopia. Trans. Paul Turner. New York: Penguin Books,



© 2011 Все права защищены